I don't treat LWN as a news site. I read it as Jonathan's summary of what is going on. He does a good job at summarizing. If I asked a friend to give that summa

I don't treat LWN as a news site. I read it as Jonathan's summary of what is going on. He does a good job at summarizing. If I asked a friend to give that summary too I would treat it like that, or maybe I would value it as if I had summarized it myself. There is always a need to understand what biases went into this kind of digest and that does not go away regardless of who is writing it. My point is that Jonathan might forget to include, say, some Rust person or a kernel developer but he isn't going to write something like "kernel developers debate whether security is important; Rust mentioned" like an LLM might. I get the information I want and nothing more.