3 ms·
Much different circumstance (more collusion) if you are thinking of the Google/Apple/Intel lawsuit: "Apple, Google, Intel fail to dismiss staff-poaching lawsuit
by salemh 14y ago
Much different circumstance (more collusion) if you are thinking of the Google/Apple/Intel lawsuit:
"Apple, Google, Intel fail to dismiss staff-poaching lawsuit | Reuters"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/19/us-apple-poaching-lawsuit-idUSBRE83I0VF20120419 http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/19/us-apple-poaching-...
Or Google:
https://www.google.com/search?sugexp=chrome,mod=1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=google+settlement+apple+employee+poach https://www.google.com/search?sugexp=chrome,mod=1&source...
- rprasad 14y agoDifferent circumstances, but still illegal in California because it restricts the freedom of employment of Meebo's employees. No-poaching clauses are illegal in California, but poaching clauses can contain "referral fees" under which the poaching company must pay the original employer a substantial amount of money (usually, a year's salary of the employee poached) if they hire one of its employees during or within a year after the end of the contract period.