4 ms·
This right here is astoundingly good science journalism. Accurate (to the best of my knowledge) and clear, that's all I ask, and this brief article in The Econo
by planetguy 14y ago
This right here is astoundingly good science journalism. Accurate (to the best of my knowledge) and clear, that's all I ask, and this brief article in The Economist gets it right.
Am I missing something, or is the writer's name not mentioned?
- glhaynes 14y agoArticles in The Economist don't get bylines: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_economist#Tone_and_voice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_economist#Tone_and_voice
- planetguy 14y agoThat's a shame, because this writer is far better than most science journalists. If you're out there, anonymous writer, nice work!
- anigbrowl 14y agoIt's always this good.
- kristianp 14y agoNo, not accurate. The article is about zone plates, not fresnel lenses.
- colanderman 14y agoThe article doesn't actually mention "fresnel lens" anywhere. It does mention "zone plate" five times though.