3 ms·
I follow the latest updates to FSD and it's clear to me that they are getting closer to robotaxis really fast.
by vagab0nd 2y ago
I follow the latest updates to FSD and it's clear to me that they are getting closer to robotaxis really fast.
- squigz 2y agoThat's what was said years ago.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- TheAlchemist 2y agoYeah I follow it too. There is progress for sure, one have to wonder if the CEO was very consciously lying 5, 8 years ago when he said they are less than 1 year away from robotaxis, given how shitty the system was. They are on a path of linear improvement. They would need to go on a path of exponential improvement to have any hope of a working robotaxi in the next 2 years. That's not happening at all.
- ssnistfajen 2y agoFSD isn't getting "solved" without outlawing human drivers, period. Otherwise you are trying to solve a non-deterministic system with deterministic software under a 0% error tolerance rate. Even without human drivers you still have to deal with all the non-vehicle entities that pop onto the road from time to time. Jaywalkers alone is almost as complex to deal with as human drivers.
- WFHRenaissance 2y agoLOL this is BS. We have plenty of deterministic software being used to solve non-deterministic systems already. I agree that 0% error rate will require the removal of all human drivers from the system, but 0.0001% error rate will be seen as accepted risk.
- blitzar 2y agoI hear they will have FSD by the end of the year. which year exactly is TBA