The laptop being in the car came from the ex-girlfriend. "the only evidence connecting Mr. Williams to the crime was a witness who said Mr. Williams sold him a

The laptop being in the car came from the ex-girlfriend. "the only evidence connecting Mr. Williams to the crime was a witness who said Mr. Williams sold him a laptop taken from Ms. Gayle’s home, but the jury did not learn that Mr. Williams told the witness he had received the laptop from Laura Asaro." > You (and The Innocence Project) apparently think that DNA must be found at the crime scene in order to convict. Why exactly do you think this given the more than half dozen points outlined which illustrate the weak case?