3 ms·

ClamAV is open source

• AStonesThrow 2y ago
  That was not the premise, and I see no relation between license and telemetry. That being said, I used to run ClamAV, and as I understood it, it was far from a complete security suite, only a scanner, and had no reason to communicate with anything. Also, it never gave me anything but false positives, flagging image files (jpg, png) on my Linux system with obsolete/benign win32 malware. I wasn't running win32. Idiots.
  • dizhn 2y ago
    clamav is used as a network based scanner. It's not unreasonable for it to flag windows malware on a Linux host.
    • AStonesThrow 2y ago
      Indeed, that's the idea, such as protecting the users of an MTA/POP3 host. That's not what I was running, and ClamAV cannot replace Windows Defender, McAfee or Norton, no matter how freakin' free its source is. Honestly.
      • dizhn 2y ago
        I don't run antivirus on my desktop but you're probably right. They don't have the resources to be an all around antivirus solution. Their engine does have value beyond antivirus though. For example I am using it with non-virus signatures to block various malicious email types.