4 ms·
I'm not comparing actual devices. I'm comparing how large they were when they were first released. The original iPod and iPhones were bricks compared to what th
by impulser_ 2y ago
I'm not comparing actual devices. I'm comparing how large they were when they were first released. The original iPod and iPhones were bricks compared to what the latest/last versions and it didn't have a touch screen and cameras.
The point is, the size of new technology tend to shrink fast.
- wewtyflakes 2y agoThe first iphone famously had a touch screen, and it was smaller than the current iphone 16.
- kentm 2y agoYou are incorrect about the original iPhone. It was marginally thicker but it had smaller width and height than current iPhones.
- grahamj 2y agoyeah and the 16 Pros got even bigger this year!
- al_borland 2y agoThe original iPod might have been a brick compared to the iPod nano, but it still wasn't that big. I don't think many people today would be upset to carry an original iPod. It was much smaller than the discman sized devices it was competing with. The original iPhone was one of the smallest iPhones ever made. It did nothing but get bigger over time. If you want to compare the modern smart phone to a Zack Morris phone, or the bag phones that came before it, that would be a better way to go if the argument is size reduction over time.