3 ms·
> Banning single-family homes in a vast majority of places is unnecessary. > Banning single-family housing in most places in the US is not necessary Why do yo
by josephcsible 2y ago
> Banning single-family homes in a vast majority of places is unnecessary.
> Banning single-family housing in most places in the US is not necessary
Why do you qualify those statements with "most" and "a vast majority of"? Are there places where you do want to only allow high-density housing and totally ban single-family homes?
- Moomoomoo309 2y agoSure. Along transit corridors in a city would be a prime example. A single family home right next to a train station in a major city is stupid.