4 ms·

Bad? I just tried Gemini and it was useless.

• andrewinardeer 2y ago
  Google ought to hang its head in utter disgrace over the putrid swill they have the audacity to peddle under the Gemini label. Their laughably overzealous nanny-state censorship, paired with a model so appallingly inept it would embarrass a chatbot from the 90s, makes it nothing short of highway robbery that this digital dumpster fire is permitted to masquerade as a product fit for public consumption. The sheer gall of Google to foist this steaming pile of silicon refuse onto unsuspecting users borders on fraudulent.
• mnk47 2y ago
  Starting to wonder why this is so common in LLM discussions at HN. Someone says "X is the model that really impressive. Y is good too." Then someone responds "What?! I just used Z and it was terrible!" I see this at least once in practically every AI thread
  • tomrod 2y ago
    Humans understand mean but struggle with variance.
  • rpmisms 2y ago
    It depends on what you're writing. GPT-4 can pump out average React all day long. It's next to useless with Laravel.
• fzzzy 2y ago
  You're the one that chose to try Gemini for some reason.