5 ms·
Which is arguably a good thing (having AGI spread amongst multiple entities rather than one leader).
by xur17 2y ago
Which is arguably a good thing (having AGI spread amongst multiple entities rather than one leader).
- tomrod 2y agoThe show Person of Interest comes to mind.
- tempodox 2y agoSamaritan will take us by the hand and lead us safely through this brave new world.
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y agoHow is that good? An arms race increases the pressure to go fast and disregard alignment safety, non proliferation is essential.
- actionfromafar 2y agoI think that train left some time ago.
- ssnistfajen 2y agoProbably off-topic for this thread but my own rather fatalist view is alignment/safety is a waste of effort if AGI will happen. True AGI will be able to self-modify at a pace beyond human comprehension, and won't be obligated to comply with whatever values we've set for it. If it can be reined in with human-set rules like a magical spell, then it is not AGI. If humans have free will, then AGI will have it too. Humans frequently go rogue and reject value systems that took decades to be baked into them. There is no reason to believe AGI won't do the same.
- PhilipRoman 2y agoFeels like the pope trying to ban crossbows tbh.