Don't blame me. It reads the referenced article and uses it. If the referenced article is sloppy (as per your ivory-tower standards), then the AI's analysis can

Don't blame me. It reads the referenced article and uses it. If the referenced article is sloppy (as per your ivory-tower standards), then the AI's analysis can reflect the same. Tell me, why does the referenced article say: > "We recommend keeping track of the soybean oil in your diet to make sure you are not consuming excessive linoleic acid," Deol said. "That is our take-home message." Maybe you should be emailing the researchers instead about how you think science reporting should be done. Also, the AI sees things in a broader perspective than you. If there are other references that add weight to the thought, basically everything else in the section, it will use them to produce a cohesive output. Also let me remind you that things work differently from a risk management perspective. For someone who is suffering, mice or no mice, they will be far better off heeding the advice until more science comes along. The only thing dangerous here is the wilful ignorance espoused by you. Even so, acting in good faith, I will see what I can do to alter the prompt to maintain the context.