7 ms·
> Teams is legitimately such awful software that it alone serves as evidence that Microsoft needs to be broken up That has to be the weirdest argument I've hea
by diggan 2y ago
> Teams is legitimately such awful software that it alone serves as evidence that Microsoft needs to be broken up
That has to be the weirdest argument I've heard for why a company should be broken up.
Microsoft obviously doesn't understand UX nor UI design, hence the company needs to be broken up into parts? I agree with the former, but I don't understand how the conclusion would fix that.
- bearjaws 2y agoWhy is that weird? A product that would not have stood on its own, would have 100% failed, has only finally been made DECENT almost 8 years later due to the fact its bolted on to O365.
- blibble 2y ago> has only finally been made DECENT almost 8 years later decent? you can't mean teams?? one instance of the client uses more memory and resources than every ircd on the planet combined
- dijit 2y agoThe argument is that Teams is so legitimately terrible that it's dominance is proof that market forces aren't working and that Microsoft is using its dominance in one area to enter other areas.