3 ms·
Sorry, I meant to say that with only 6.8% of all tests triggering a false alarm (and 0% true alarm), a test operator still found a way to prevent the alarm from
by IIsi50MHz 2y ago
Sorry, I meant to say that with only 6.8% of all tests triggering a false alarm (and 0% true alarm), a test operator still found a way to prevent the alarm from occurring rather than being kept on their toes.
- PoignardAzur 2y agoYeah, but again, the problem isn't the high false positive rate. The problem is that given any positive at all, the chance it points to a problem is still virtually zero. If it was 6.8% of all tests as false positives and 2% true positives, probably people wouldn't have silenced the alarm. If it goes off 8 times a day and 2 of them are true positives, then people have recent memories of having to fix problems pointed by the alarm.