3 ms·
Currently LLM’s have pretty limited context windows and limited ability to come up with brand new ideas, right? But they do write very confidently. So they’ll h
by bee_rider 2y ago
Currently LLM’s have pretty limited context windows and limited ability to come up with brand new ideas, right? But they do write very confidently. So they’ll have to find some people at the company whose main contribution is contextless repetitive pablum, empty phrases expressed with great vigor and confidence. Preferably someone highly paid. Surely nobody like that is working there…
- anticorporate 2y agoI bet you could even use an LLM to analyze the work output of different groups within a company and see whose output most closely matches that of an LLM. Hint: Those people won't have words like "content" "editor" "writer" or "documentation" in their title. They will, though, likely have words like "director" and "vice president" in there somewhere.
- bee_rider 2y agoHaha. In general, I’m trying very hard to not see jobs I don’t understand as easily replaced by LLMs. Everyone thinks somebody else can be, right? But I would be fascinated to see a company with the higher levels replaced by LLMs. Like a union or guild where the members are actually voting on the real decisions, and the LLMs handle summarizing these decisions and building narratives. No idea of it would work. Might still need a human CEO. Would be interesting to see, though.
- rpcope1 2y agoBesides the obvious, you could honestly replace a huge amount of the horrendous documentation (50%+ of it is just carefully camouflaged marketing fluff anyways) for a large number of IBM products with the hallucinations of an LLM and be no worse off.
- risyachka 2y ago>>> have pretty limited context windows and limited ability to come up with brand new ideas, right? But they do write very confidently so LLMs are basically senior management? :P