11 ms·
...I'm not at all clear what this external review would be for either the UK or Switzerland.
by crimsoneer 2y ago
...I'm not at all clear what this external review would be for either the UK or Switzerland.
- famouswaffles 2y agoUnder a strict reading of the AI Act, advanced voice mode would be illegal because it is the "use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons"
- crimsoneer 2y agoBut the AI Act doesn't apply in the UK, and as far as I know doesn't in Switzerland either...?
- famouswaffles 2y agoSorry I don't think it does either. Kind of glazed over the fact you were talking about the UK specifically It's just speculation on my part that that's the actual reason for some of those markets. It might have to do with (old) EU specific regulations. I know the UK adopted many EU laws to expedite brexit.
- sunaookami 2y agoSomeone else on X speculated that it might be in relation to GDPR article 35 and 36. GDPR would make more sense since the UK still has it and I think other non-EU countries are also included/have similar laws.
- lxgr 2y agoHow so (for personal use, at least)?
- famouswaffles 2y agoTo be clear, 1. This is just speculation 2. It could just be enough reason to cause review
- mike_hearn 2y agoJudging from the list of countries this looks like a Europe vs EU confusion somewhere inside OpenAI. That is someone said "Europe" needs external review, and this got translated into "EU+other countries in Europe" for launch control. Unfortunately the EU strongly encourages this sort of confusion. EU Commission staff and MEPs constantly say "Europe" when what they mean is the EU. And because most of Europe is in the EU, it's especially confusing.