2 ms·
The reason is confidentiality agreements after a settlement. This isn’t a settlement.
by NotYourLawyer 2y ago
The reason is confidentiality agreements after a settlement. This isn’t a settlement.
- dathinab 2y agoand it also doesn't disclose any actual information except that they stopped direct peering
- stop50 2y agoThis german news article explains what happened, they quote directly from the ruling: https://www.golem.de/news/kabel-nicht-gezogen-meta-muss-telekom-fuer-peering-bezahlen-2405-185159.html https://www.golem.de/news/kabel-nicht-gezogen-meta-muss-tele...
- shakna 2y agoThe other reason is defamation. The line that constitutes it is lowered, when you're talking about something that has gone before the courts.