> AI will accelerate, not minimize, inequality and thus injustice Your argument here seems to rely on hand waving away a bunch of stuff through this statement:

> AI will accelerate, not minimize, inequality and thus injustice Your argument here seems to rely on hand waving away a bunch of stuff through this statement: > Yes, the U.S. had a middle class after the war, and yes, China has lifted rural people out of technical poverty. But those are the exceptions against the background of consolidation of wealth and power world wide. What? You cannot truly believe that the average person has worse injustice or a worse life than the average person 1000 years ago. And for me, the entire crux of your argument depends on believing that. So it just falls down.