4 ms·

>I'm happy to see some counter-evidence that she's lying and all of this is made up. I presented the exact, same, precise, amount of evidence she did, with one

>I'm happy to see some counter-evidence that she's lying and all of this is made up. I presented the exact, same, precise, amount of evidence she did, with one exception. I used common sense. If you believe that she saw someone waterboarded to death, WHICH IS WHAT SHE CLAIMED at the twelve minute and thirty seconds mark, you are beyond reason. That entire video is nothing more than the insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument that should be dispassionate: you, I, and everyone else has the right to choose the time and manner of their death. If you want to jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants, bedridden, stoned out of your mind on morphine while your family agonizes for weeks as your respiratory tidal volume slowly decreases as the morphine doses increase until you suffocate that is also your right. Your book has no right to tell me what to do and the jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat.

aliasxneo 2y ago
I'm sorry you feel that way. You seem to be unreasonable in your anger and hatred for Christians, so clearly, any argument I make is going to be disregarded as nonsensical. > HOW DO WE AS A SOCIETY GET THESE JESUSFREAKS TO LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE? > jesusfreak sociopath. Good combo > insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument > jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants > jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat. If you replaced "jesusfreak" in your comments with basically any other identity, you'd pretty quickly get accused of multiple "isms" by others. The hypocrisy is deafening.
- snakeyjake 2y ago
  Barring any evidence, of which there was none in that video, you must evaluate the credibility of the speaker based on the entirety of their message. Do you or do you not believe that thinking that someone should be tortured to death by waterboarding makes you a sociopath? Do you or do you not believe that a suburban Canadian stay-at-home mother personally witnessed: 1. a human being, 2. being waterboarded, 3. until that human being died? Yes, or no? I say yes it makes you a sociopath and no she did not witness a human die due to being waterboarded. That makes her as credible as Alex Jones. I'm sorry you're offended by the term "jesusfreak", a term reserved for use on christians who try to force their ideology on the wider population. Perhaps you identify with them?

aliasxneo 2y ago

I'm sorry you feel that way. You seem to be unreasonable in your anger and hatred for Christians, so clearly, any argument I make is going to be disregarded as nonsensical. > HOW DO WE AS A SOCIETY GET THESE JESUSFREAKS TO LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE? > jesusfreak sociopath. Good combo > insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument > jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants > jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat. If you replaced "jesusfreak" in your comments with basically any other identity, you'd pretty quickly get accused of multiple "isms" by others. The hypocrisy is deafening.

snakeyjake 2y ago
Barring any evidence, of which there was none in that video, you must evaluate the credibility of the speaker based on the entirety of their message. Do you or do you not believe that thinking that someone should be tortured to death by waterboarding makes you a sociopath? Do you or do you not believe that a suburban Canadian stay-at-home mother personally witnessed: 1. a human being, 2. being waterboarded, 3. until that human being died? Yes, or no? I say yes it makes you a sociopath and no she did not witness a human die due to being waterboarded. That makes her as credible as Alex Jones. I'm sorry you're offended by the term "jesusfreak", a term reserved for use on christians who try to force their ideology on the wider population. Perhaps you identify with them?