4 ms·
Yes this is the crux and the fun of my discovery! I was surprised how using sips to rotate the image resulted in a lower size than using sips or ImageMagick to
by sotix 2y ago
Yes this is the crux and the fun of my discovery! I was surprised how using sips to rotate the image resulted in a lower size than using sips or ImageMagick to directly compress the image.
I’d encourage you to download the image from the link in the article and try yourself if you have a Mac and then compare them with GIMP because it’s very possible I didn’t do a perfect job with that.
- lifthrasiir 2y agoSee my other comment for the result from ImageMagick, which shows little difference regardless of the orientation. For sips, there is a possibility that chroma subsampling impacted the result (because there are two different scaling factors for each axis) and you are technically comparing different images.