I do agree that perspective is more accurate; Chrome was always going to be huge with a combination of Google's development effort and advertising. However Mozi

I do agree that perspective is more accurate; Chrome was always going to be huge with a combination of Google's development effort and advertising. However Mozilla's leadership have done an unimpressive job. They took a large amount of money from Google, decided that their vision of how the internet should work was identical to Google's, then converged Firefox to being an inferior Chrome clone. Brave does a better job of articulating a different vision of the web than Firefox and it is a Chrome fork; the situation is a bit ridiculous [0, 1]. And Brave's crypto scheme, while maybe it'll work and maybe it won't, is a radical re-imagination of how the web could be commercialised. So there is clearly room to imagine an internet other than the one Google wants where everyone has Google Ads. So yes, Google was going to win the fight Mozilla picked, but Mozilla picked a losing strategy. [0] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browsers/compare/chrome/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browsers/compare/chrom... [1] https://brave.com/compare/chrome-vs-brave/ https://brave.com/compare/chrome-vs-brave/