This kind of report always raises the question for me of what the existing system's goals are. I think people assume that "new, reliable knowledge" is among the

This kind of report always raises the question for me of what the existing system's goals are. I think people assume that "new, reliable knowledge" is among the goals, but I don't see that the incentives align toward that goal, so I don't know that that's actually among them. Does the world really want/need such a system? (The answer seems obvious to me, but not above question.) If so, how could it be designed? What incentives would it need? What conflicting interests would need to be disincentivized? I think it's been pretty evident for a long time that the "peer-reviewed publications system" doesn't produce the results people think it should. I just don't hear anybody really thinking through the systems involved to try to invent one that would.