3 ms·
Ah yeah. Feels like you could argue either way! In any case I don’t think library duplication is a meaningful issue in most cases. As evidenced by everyone usi
by forrestthewoods 2y ago
Ah yeah. Feels like you could argue either way!
In any case I don’t think library duplication is a meaningful issue in most cases. As evidenced by everyone using Docker which duplicates libraries!
Feels like this could be totally solved at the filesystem level with copy-on-write de-duplication. The best of both worlds!
- max-privatevoid 2y agoFS deduplication solves the problem at the storage level, but not at the transfer level. The components would still be downloaded multiple times if the downloader doesn't have a way to know what has already been downloaded. Docker's way of doing things is basically an admittance of defeat by lazy engineers. We can do better than that.