3 ms·
Your arguments come off as incrementally disingenuous and intentionally misleading. That's +1% share of a pie on the order of $TRILLIONS between 2006-2013 to w
by metaphor 2y ago
Your arguments come off as incrementally disingenuous and intentionally misleading.
That's +1% share of a pie on the order of $TRILLIONS between 2006-2013 to which the top-1% directly benefited from by under-reporting and playing pass-through games...and this was retrospective analysis long before the TCJA corporate tailwind went into effect.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoHow is it disingenuous and misleading. It is a clear and accurate summary. The bottom line is 1% of income. Im not saying it is zero dollars. Just pointing out that it is 1% for context. 50% of income would be a very different context.