4 ms·
If it's important, it should go in archive.is. Sites have always been able to remove their own content from Wayback Machine.
by dimensi0nal 2y ago
If it's important, it should go in archive.is. Sites have always been able to remove their own content from Wayback Machine.
- viiviiv 2y agoThat archive site loses pages too. I've followed links to pages others have archived years ago and they're missing. Completely gone even when searching for the URL or fragments of it.
- bomewish 2y agoArchive.is seems even sketchier doesn’t it? Who is paying for all that? Total mystery. I wouldn’t be surprised if it just vanished one day. I feel like the solution is some version of local personal archive + zenodo plus those others.
- r721 2y agoRelated discussion: >Archive.today: on the trail of mysterious guerrilla archivists of the Internet https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37009598 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37009598 (2023)