> the cost of an item increases by approximately the amount of the subsidy the government provides. Vis-a-vis food stamps and unemployment checks, I don't thin

> the cost of an item increases by approximately the amount of the subsidy the government provides. Vis-a-vis food stamps and unemployment checks, I don't think you can draw the correlation you think exists. Particularly past a certain level of poverty, the state ends up spending more to manage the consequences of unemployment than it saves by refusing to fix it. UBI in this case perpetuates inequity but it also greases the wheels of a down-and-out working population that can be motivated by higher standards of living. From a net-gain perspective, developed nations investing in themselves like this makes sense. The alternative is letting the middle class rot, which is something that only the upper-class would stand to gain from.