3 ms·
This wasn't about money either. This was him wanting users to be able to boost reprehensible content without having to put their names on it. He sees this as a
by gkoberger 2y ago
This wasn't about money either. This was him wanting users to be able to boost reprehensible content without having to put their names on it.
He sees this as an antidote to cancel culture; he's allowing people to support things they agree with without society's repercussions.
- XorNot 2y agoWell hang on I mean we're also excluding option 3 here: they just straight up broke the service which provided that feature somewhere between haphazardly decommissioning a data center without planning, and the mass layoffs based on code commit printouts, and now no one knows how to fix it.