3 ms·

Unfortunately, you've not contributed much to furthering any knowledge here since it's all just speculation in a mocking and demeaning tone. I was slightly exci

Unfortunately, you've not contributed much to furthering any knowledge here since it's all just speculation in a mocking and demeaning tone. I was slightly excited to see a lengthy response, hoping for some substantiated counter-arguments, but it appears to have just enraged you to the point of using very visceral and divisive language. Unfortunate. For what it's worth, I am a Christian and your choice of words come across as highly offensive. Contrary to your belief, I have no interest in inserting myself into your life. I'm apolitical at best and gave up on politics a long time ago. To respond to at least one point, I believe the point that she was making was a lack of awareness of the method of death. Her point has nothing to do with how people die of cancer, but that people agreeing to MAID did not have all of the necessary information to make that decision due to this being omitted. I'm happy to see some counter-evidence that she's lying and all of this is made up.

snakeyjake 2y ago
>I'm happy to see some counter-evidence that she's lying and all of this is made up. I presented the exact, same, precise, amount of evidence she did, with one exception. I used common sense. If you believe that she saw someone waterboarded to death, WHICH IS WHAT SHE CLAIMED at the twelve minute and thirty seconds mark, you are beyond reason. That entire video is nothing more than the insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument that should be dispassionate: you, I, and everyone else has the right to choose the time and manner of their death. If you want to jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants, bedridden, stoned out of your mind on morphine while your family agonizes for weeks as your respiratory tidal volume slowly decreases as the morphine doses increase until you suffocate that is also your right. Your book has no right to tell me what to do and the jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat.
- aliasxneo 2y ago
  I'm sorry you feel that way. You seem to be unreasonable in your anger and hatred for Christians, so clearly, any argument I make is going to be disregarded as nonsensical. > HOW DO WE AS A SOCIETY GET THESE JESUSFREAKS TO LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE? > jesusfreak sociopath. Good combo > insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument > jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants > jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat. If you replaced "jesusfreak" in your comments with basically any other identity, you'd pretty quickly get accused of multiple "isms" by others. The hypocrisy is deafening.
  - snakeyjake 2y ago
    Barring any evidence, of which there was none in that video, you must evaluate the credibility of the speaker based on the entirety of their message. Do you or do you not believe that thinking that someone should be tortured to death by waterboarding makes you a sociopath? Do you or do you not believe that a suburban Canadian stay-at-home mother personally witnessed: 1. a human being, 2. being waterboarded, 3. until that human being died? Yes, or no? I say yes it makes you a sociopath and no she did not witness a human die due to being waterboarded. That makes her as credible as Alex Jones. I'm sorry you're offended by the term "jesusfreak", a term reserved for use on christians who try to force their ideology on the wider population. Perhaps you identify with them?
HeatrayEnjoyer 2y ago
[flagged]

snakeyjake 2y ago

>I'm happy to see some counter-evidence that she's lying and all of this is made up. I presented the exact, same, precise, amount of evidence she did, with one exception. I used common sense. If you believe that she saw someone waterboarded to death, WHICH IS WHAT SHE CLAIMED at the twelve minute and thirty seconds mark, you are beyond reason. That entire video is nothing more than the insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument that should be dispassionate: you, I, and everyone else has the right to choose the time and manner of their death. If you want to jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants, bedridden, stoned out of your mind on morphine while your family agonizes for weeks as your respiratory tidal volume slowly decreases as the morphine doses increase until you suffocate that is also your right. Your book has no right to tell me what to do and the jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat.

aliasxneo 2y ago
I'm sorry you feel that way. You seem to be unreasonable in your anger and hatred for Christians, so clearly, any argument I make is going to be disregarded as nonsensical. > HOW DO WE AS A SOCIETY GET THESE JESUSFREAKS TO LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE? > jesusfreak sociopath. Good combo > insertion of jesusfreakiness into an argument > jesusfreak your way into heaven by shitting your pants > jesusfreaks are trying to cram their book down my throat. If you replaced "jesusfreak" in your comments with basically any other identity, you'd pretty quickly get accused of multiple "isms" by others. The hypocrisy is deafening.
- snakeyjake 2y ago
  Barring any evidence, of which there was none in that video, you must evaluate the credibility of the speaker based on the entirety of their message. Do you or do you not believe that thinking that someone should be tortured to death by waterboarding makes you a sociopath? Do you or do you not believe that a suburban Canadian stay-at-home mother personally witnessed: 1. a human being, 2. being waterboarded, 3. until that human being died? Yes, or no? I say yes it makes you a sociopath and no she did not witness a human die due to being waterboarded. That makes her as credible as Alex Jones. I'm sorry you're offended by the term "jesusfreak", a term reserved for use on christians who try to force their ideology on the wider population. Perhaps you identify with them?

HeatrayEnjoyer 2y ago

[flagged]