4 ms·

Yeah exactly, that was my reading too! The claim in the link doesn't match what the POSIX bug says If it did, then would be a sign that the POSIX process is n

by chubot 2y ago

Yeah exactly, that was my reading too! The claim in the link doesn't match what the POSIX bug says If it did, then would be a sign that the POSIX process is not working well Because POSIX is supposed to be descriptive of what exists, not prescribe new behavior

enriquto 2y ago
> POSIX is supposed to be descriptive of what exists, not prescribe new behavior Well, it can be argued that ape already existed when that POSIX change was written :) Everything is working as intended. Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.