2 ms·
My understanding was that he said that the headlines report numbers that are not backed off by science (your first quote) and then goes on explaining why (your
by BrandoElFollito 2y ago
My understanding was that he said that the headlines report numbers that are not backed off by science (your first quote) and then goes on explaining why (your second quite).
He could have used "high" and "USA" instead and it would have been the same.
- Sammi 2y agoHad he left out "rather than a meaningful difference in outcomes" then maybe. But he didn't and made is initial argument sound stronger than it is. Classic motte-and-bailey argument.