I don't understand why this got down-voted. Having read up about AI and looked into things like neural networks I can definitely tell that he's wrong. But surel

I don't understand why this got down-voted. Having read up about AI and looked into things like neural networks I can definitely tell that he's wrong. But surely the questions he asks are pertinent to the discussion, aren't they? For someone foreign to the field they actually make a lot of sense and I would be very hard pressed to tell him why he's wrong given that I only have very little knowledge myself. Surely whoever thought this post was so wrong as to merit down-voting could explain why that is and answer the man's questions?