> It just acknowledges that there's no value in making an assumption about how the dead would feel when there's no way to know and no family alive to express an

> It just acknowledges that there's no value in making an assumption about how the dead would feel when there's no way to know and no family alive to express an opinion. But your stance is also making an assumption about how the dead would feel. It's just a different assumption than those that feel this shouldn't be allowed. It seems to me that in the absence of the ability to get consent, assuming consent should not be the fallback position.