> As for how the orange peels were able to regenerate the site so effectively in just 16 years of isolation, nobody's entirely sure. Well, the first thing that

> As for how the orange peels were able to regenerate the site so effectively in just 16 years of isolation, nobody's entirely sure. Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is: Maybe it wasn't only the orange peels. Perhaps there were other factors that contributed to the turn around. And given that this was a one-off they need to reproduce this experiment again, ideally two more times. Once is not a pattern. Even twice isn't a pattern. Three times? Now we can begin to identify and consider there might be a causation-worthy pattern. To often we want a single causation, and more often than not it's not that simple.