2 ms·

I disagree that this was the extent of the question here. It is relevant to determine the quality of the law. It is also relevant to determine the prevalence of

I disagree that this was the extent of the question here. It is relevant to determine the quality of the law. It is also relevant to determine the prevalence of legal certainty. If the latter is low, you involve the courts. I just remarked that this is not a solution for a bad idea. The example of DMCA should make the relevance more vivid as there are a lot of parallels.

llamaimperative 2y ago
> It is also relevant to determine the prevalence of legal certainty. If the latter is low, you involve the courts This is not how/when/why courts get involved. And no, the law itself can be perfectly fine and the court system can be too slow. Mixing the two problems makes it impossible to solve when neither problem is actually impossible.