3 ms·
Given its more ambitious goals and greater scope, Rust was always going to take a lot longer to mature than Go, so that there was no plausible chance of it reac
by chrismorgan 2y ago
Given its more ambitious goals and greater scope, Rust was always going to take a lot longer to mature than Go, so that there was no plausible chance of it reaching 1.0 before Go, if they started within a year or two of each other.
- pjmlp 2y agoExcept that on a different timeline really means Rust achieving 1.0 before Go, I didn't assert nothing else would have changed when they came to be in first place. A different timeline is exactly that, a different line of events.