3 ms·
The article says they banned "more than" 10000 books, and you mentioned one. Thus the rest of 9999 books could easily have many on the subject.
by Johanx64 2y ago
The article says they banned "more than" 10000 books, and you mentioned one.
Thus the rest of 9999 books could easily have many on the subject.
- autoexec 2y agoThe vast majority of those 9999 books could just as easily (and far more likely than not) contain zero mention of those two subjects entirely. No, somedude895 was just using extreme examples without evidence or context to justify the banning of more than 10,000 books as though even if one or two out of the more than 10,000 books did somehow happen to mention those topics that it would justify such ridiculous censorship.