4 ms·
LCDs are still widely available and dirt cheap thanks to cutthroat competition, but the only reason why you'd buy one these days is if you can't afford OLED. (T
by NavinF 2y ago
LCDs are still widely available and dirt cheap thanks to cutthroat competition, but the only reason why you'd buy one these days is if you can't afford OLED. (That includes everyone that's worried about burn-in)
- theshackleford 2y agoOr if you know, you want to maintain any level of brightness over a greater than a 10% window. I have OLED's and MiniLED on my desk. Each excels in a different area. The OLED can't even get close to the MiniLED's HDR performance, whilst the MiniLED gets close enough to the OLEDs strength for 95% of content. Save for motion, OLED reams LCD in motion. I just wish I could have everything in the one panel but alas we are just not there. I'm hoping we see major bumps to OLED on the desktops brightness over the next few generations of panel as it's still early days to be fair. For now, it's likely ill keep both on my desk. OLED for darker tighters only supplying the occasional highlight, MiniLED for everything else including titles calling for large and sustained brightness values.
- EugeneOZ 2y agoNo, it doesn't include everyone. My daughter loves to put a beautiful image on her iPad and make it stay like a picture frame for hours. She’s a kid, she doesn't care if pixels burn out, and if I try to prohibit it, it will just happen more often. For me, OLED is better, sure.
- hedora 2y agoOLED brightness still hasn’t quite caught up, and many of the bright LED backlit LCDs have great color gamuts, and supposedly almost true black: https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/bright-room https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/bright-room Anyway, if you have a big window in the room where your TV is, brightness probably should be the deciding factor.