> The owl house literally won an award for best childrens tv (albeit it does look deep enough to be enjoyed by adults) Yes, but it also has a large adult follo

> The owl house literally won an award for best childrens tv (albeit it does look deep enough to be enjoyed by adults) Yes, but it also has a large adult following. It is not TARGETING children unlike a show like Blue's Clues. Therefore I don't think you can classify it as you put "pixar level children shows" (which I don't even know what that means). > Wikipedia describes Final Space as a comedy Maybe... personally while I think Final Space does have comedic elements - it also has an overarching storyline and is more of an epic adventure dealing with tragedy, death, and loss at a pretty adult level. > Infinity Train can't be legally purchased Literally this has nothing to do with the main point which was that western animation does not have variety > Sure, but that is both a cause and effect of it failing to capture audiences the way anime has. We weren't discussing whether or not something appeals to an audience. We were discussing whether or not there was sufficient variety. I think the root of our disagreement is in "volume" and I would argue that there is plenty unless you absolutely need to be consuming media every day. There might be significantly LESS from a quantity perspective, but the DIVERSITY in shows is 100% available if you know where to look. And in fact the actual OP post that I was addressing (because I think we're getting a bit off track) was that "cartoons in the USA fall under the rough set of same humor or writers" which is, assuming one possesses even a modest amount of experience with western animation, patently false.