> "What are people for?" is a question that cannot be answered by intelligence no matter how great It absolutely can be answered, but only the the intender. W

> "What are people for?" is a question that cannot be answered by intelligence no matter how great It absolutely can be answered, but only the the intender. Who is and who was and who is to come. Or, if you side with the "Nietzche is right" side of the conversation "who will be or who may have come to be today or who recently came to be again". The former is eucatastrophic, the latter is dystopic.