It's a layman commentary on the Universal Approximation Theory so it is true. The problem with the UAT is that it's never said anything about how trivial such

It's a layman commentary on the Universal Approximation Theory so it is true. The problem with the UAT is that it's never said anything about how trivial such an exercise would be. But he obviously believes we've stumbled on the architecture to get us there (for problems we care about anyway)