3 ms·
There are three goals from this strategy. 1) Protect domestic electric car companies. (100% tariffs is an example of same) 2) Protect us consumers privacy from
by more_corn 2y ago
There are three goals from this strategy.
1) Protect domestic electric car companies. (100% tariffs is an example of same)
2) Protect us consumers privacy from a country that believes privacy is for the wicked.
3) Protect national security by preventing deployment of technology controlled by an adversarial state.
I acknowledge that the move hinders a transition to electric vehicles and a greening of the grid. It’s a violation of free market principles in that a better product is available for cheaper and this prevents the best and cheapest electric cars from making it to the US market.
However, the other two goals are also legitimate. China does have a terrible track record for privacy. And running millions of computers on wheels fully controlled by an adversarial state (as is required under Chinese law) is bad strategy.
- aurareturn 2y agoIf privacy is important, people will not buy Chinese cars. Free market.
- itake 2y agoIf safety is important, people will not buy unsafe cars. Free market. We should just get rid of safety regulations and let the free market decide if they want to pay for addons like seat belts or air bags.
- aurareturn 2y agoPrivacy isn’t on the same spectrum as things that can kill you in an instant. There is a risk level for each individual event. You can regulate to the point where no one is allowed to do anything or buy anything because it can kill you. But that’s not the world we live in. Having regulation that US data can’t leave US soil would be better than a complete ban.