4 ms·
The whole “remote work kills productivity” argument is outdated. Studies and real-world examples show the opposite: many people are more productive at home with
by JSDevOps 2y ago
The whole “remote work kills productivity” argument is outdated. Studies and real-world examples show the opposite: many people are more productive at home without the daily commute and office distractions. Plus, companies have tools and strategies to keep teams connected and engaged, so the idea that culture just dissolves over time isn’t based on reality. Culture isn’t about being in the same room; it’s about values, leadership, and communication. And remote companies are proving you can have a strong, action-driven culture without a traditional office.
Also, let’s talk about this idea that employees’ good intentions aren't enough and that without the office, everything falls apart. This screams of a lack of trust in workers, which is not how modern businesses run. Successful companies trust their people, set clear expectations, and hold them accountable—whether they’re in the office or working from a coffee shop. It’s not about babysitting; it’s about outcomes.
And this notion that computer science professionals won’t have bargaining power because of some glut is just not accurate. Sure, there are more CS grads, but the demand for skilled talent is still high, especially for top performers. Companies offering WFH flexibility are not just doing it out of kindness; it’s a strategic move to attract and retain talent in a competitive market. Restricting WFH options actually puts companies at a disadvantage.
Bottom line: dismissing WFH as some kind of fad or liability ignores the reality that a ton of companies are making it work and even excelling. If anything, leaders worth their salt are those who adapt, trust their teams, and leverage the benefits of remote work, not those who cling to outdated office norms.
- jbverschoor 2y agoReally? A workplace with no proper desk, chair, lighting, multi screen setup, isolation from domestic distractions, crappy phone lines due to bad internet, the hurdle of contacting someone who used to sit next to you, and the impossibility of scribbling something on a whiteboard etc? Sure, remote work can be productive for certain work, and for certain people. But people underestimate the value of an office. Working in a coffee shop? Sure, if you have nothing to do but read some email. I love both. And I don’t mind a short commute, as it starts and ends your work, resulting in a better work-life balance
- -mlv 2y agoI doubt there are many people in tech with bad Internet. Worst case, there's Starlink. All other issues are easily solvable too, either with the right tools, or the right processes. (nb. I also think working at a coffee shop isn't for most people)
- anotherhue 2y agoEasily solvable? Tell that to the screaming toddlers.
- -mlv 2y agoCreche or another parent.
- lnenad 2y ago> All other issues are easily solvable too, either with the right tools, or the right processes. By coming back to the office?
- -mlv 2y agohttps://www.google.com/search?q=collaborative+whiteboard https://www.google.com/search?q=collaborative+whiteboard Desk, chair, lightning, monitors are easily googlable, too. Coming back to office creates more problems than it solves.
- lnenad 2y ago> Desk, chair, lightning, monitors are easily googlable, too. All those things are part of the office and you don't have to pay for them. > Coming back to office creates more problems than it solves. Other than commute which could be a bitch in the US what other problems for the company do they create? Yes hanging out at home is nice for you/me, you can rest, nap, be with your kids, do chores, but how would this matter to the company when people abuse these situations on a regular basis?