4 ms·
I know Europeans will probably be all high fiving each other and congratulating themselves on how much better their regulatory environment is. But consider the
by zmmmmm 2y ago
I know Europeans will probably be all high fiving each other and congratulating themselves on how much better their regulatory environment is.
But consider the other side of this coin : one of the biggest risks identified for AI is bias in training sets and there are actual demands that companies explicitly make their training sets as inclusive as possible to incorporate all cultures, genders, etc etc.
So if Europeans find out they are being excluded from job opportunities later on because employers are using AI tools within LinkedIn to process candidates and it simply doesn't understand the background of European candidates - will they be upset? Will they be demanding LinkedIn be fined for not including Europeans in the training set?
I am very curious how all this will play out long term as these competing tensions get worked through.
- tempaccount420 2y agoWhy can't they get that training data in another, legal way?
- edelbitter 2y agoThose "demands" for inclusive training sets are a spin attempt. And a bad one at that: It does not even address the main problem. If I refuse to be judged by a person trying to evade legal review, then that situation does not improve once they promises to make their still-hidden thought process at least as biased as the regional internet spam variety plus a few fan fiction texts for which they violated my copyrights. The whole idea of "you cannot sue me for my discriminatory practices, because I colluded with AI company X to hide the process" is a net negative. It does not matter which side of the coin is up, when I have to pay for it.