2 ms·

It could have lasting effects but did it? Only the actual harms matter to me. Life penalties didn’t prevent these assaults. So the penalty is vengeance rathe

• ActorNightly 2y ago
  >It could have lasting effects but did it? Only the actual harms matter to me. Dude come on. I know that you know this is a shit argument, so Im not even going to entertain it. >So the penalty is vengeance The "penalty" is not a penalty, its a removal of that person from the rest of society. Like I said, I would be for full reintegration centers. Put that person on LSD/Shroom/MDMA/Ketamine therapy, put him to work, build out reward systems for normal human behavior, and when he has demonstrated that he can hold down a job and resolve conflicts normally, put him back into society.
• tasuki 2y ago
  > Only the actual harms matter to me. Like you, I'm also a consequentialist. Not everyone else is! > So the penalty is vengeance rather than deterrence. It is neither vengeance nor deterrence. It is (supposed to be) protection of the public from this (supposedly) dangerous individual.
• the_gorilla 2y ago
  This is a bad excuse for drunk driving, which everyone knows is wrong because of the risks involved even most of the time you get home without killing or maiming someone.