3 ms·
dont have time to find it. he basically says the 2% thing is an antiquated understanding that conflicts with recent ancient dna studies. Go watch the podcast h
by ldjkfkdsjnv 2y ago
dont have time to find it. he basically says the 2% thing is an antiquated understanding that conflicts with recent ancient dna studies. Go watch the podcast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj6skZIxPuI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj6skZIxPuI
- simonh 2y agoI can track down the studies he’s criticising. A Google search doesn’t show up anything refuting those. What are the studies he’s citing?
- Tor3 2y agoWatched it. He didn't present _any_ sources supporting his claims. There's nothing there.
- ldjkfkdsjnv 2y agoPublishing a ton of research on this would basically be a career ending move
- dmead 2y agoOk, you're almost there. Why would it be career ending?