Following this logic I think I can conclude that computers should have been protected from computers. Because they were people who were good at managing computa

Following this logic I think I can conclude that computers should have been protected from computers. Because they were people who were good at managing computation and now soulless machines replaced the hell out of their profession. I understand most of your points, but my main question still stands: how do we choose who’s worth sparing and why it should be Ms. Johanson or wlop or my grandma whose ability basically became stolen(“”?) in the 80s. I believe this has to do with emotion more than anything else. AI theft is closer to the skin than any worker/engineer who was replaced long ago. But at the same time it is another step in human development. We can decide now if having a nice face and/or talking in a specific way is worth being a job or is a worthless skill. Still quite a skill! Just worth not much, akin to adding lots of numbers in your head now. Whatever we choose, the non-forward looking choice will be crushed by reality, as usual.