3 ms·

> A machine doing the creativity part could act like a prosthetic leg for my brain, Are you saying that we all have the innate ability to create art, and that

> A machine doing the creativity part could act like a prosthetic leg for my brain, Are you saying that we all have the innate ability to create art, and that anyone who creates art has a "handicap"? This is the point the writer was making. If you let AI make the art they people will never learn how to make art. To be able to be whatever you want while you are alive is going to make every human useless. You will be able to be replaced by anyone who can make a similar copy. Adn maybe this is the point of AI. You know, women were attracted to me because of my photography and musicianship. These were genetic traits specific to me. Other women were attracted to men who were maybe more logical. What is going to happen when we can all have the person we want? I will tell you, art will be dead. No one will make art, because art is not about intelligence, it is about tension, conflict, jealousy, pain, joy and psychosis. And you cannot have those if everyone can do anything and be anyone.

hks0 2y ago
> Are you saying that we all have the innate ability to create art, and that anyone who creates art has a "handicap"? I meant that (specifically) I, don't seem to have that innate ability everyone else seem to have, but I still feel the urge to express myself through art. Feels like wanting to shout, when you have no voice. I make the AI write stories for my own amusement, by describing each scene that AI turns into a paragraph of the final story. I always failed at writing before, and no amount of practice helped, but now I have a prosthetic leg that I can walk with. > If you let AI make the art they people will never learn how to make art. I don't agree. We have cars, but people still cycle, or join a marathon. And it makes their activities even more meaningful, they do it for the sake of itself. Or maybe they won't learn. But why should we force them? They can choose. > To be able to be whatever you want while you are alive is going to make every human useless This one I agree! I compare it to the industrial revolution, it made human workers irreverent. Would've made sense to stop the progress because of that? The AI is much worse though, it seems to make everyone and everything meaningless. But stopping AI to keep ourselves relevant, is very fake. I think it's a though question, and though I don't have the answer, I dont think the answer is stopping the AI either.

hks0 2y ago

> Are you saying that we all have the innate ability to create art, and that anyone who creates art has a "handicap"? I meant that (specifically) I, don't seem to have that innate ability everyone else seem to have, but I still feel the urge to express myself through art. Feels like wanting to shout, when you have no voice. I make the AI write stories for my own amusement, by describing each scene that AI turns into a paragraph of the final story. I always failed at writing before, and no amount of practice helped, but now I have a prosthetic leg that I can walk with. > If you let AI make the art they people will never learn how to make art. I don't agree. We have cars, but people still cycle, or join a marathon. And it makes their activities even more meaningful, they do it for the sake of itself. Or maybe they won't learn. But why should we force them? They can choose. > To be able to be whatever you want while you are alive is going to make every human useless This one I agree! I compare it to the industrial revolution, it made human workers irreverent. Would've made sense to stop the progress because of that? The AI is much worse though, it seems to make everyone and everything meaningless. But stopping AI to keep ourselves relevant, is very fake. I think it's a though question, and though I don't have the answer, I dont think the answer is stopping the AI either.