35 ms·
It's all fun and games until someone produces a recording of somebody else saying something incriminating and it will be used in court. This is the part of AI I
by surfingdino 2y ago
It's all fun and games until someone produces a recording of somebody else saying something incriminating and it will be used in court. This is the part of AI I hate.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoIt'll be bad for a few years, but surely at some point it'll become inadmissible in court because it's too easy to fake, right? But then what do we do, if video and audio footage is inadmissible?
- Ylpertnodi 2y agoWhere i am, video and audio are not admissible in court...'too easily faked'. A car bump i was in was dash-cammed, but all my team could do was second by second analysis of the video, and present that to the court. I did win, but it was very costly to do so.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoThat's crazy. For dash cam videos you can at least compare if the footage matches with the damage on the cars. And hopefully both parties have video footage, then you can really compare if something doesn't add up.
- echoangle 2y agoUnless you also hate Image Editors, I don’t really get this point. Preserving forms of evidence isn’t really a primary concern when evaluating new useful technology.
- left-struck 2y agoIt’s worse than that. People will start claiming that real, incriminating voice recordings of them are fakes as well. I think this matters more in the court of public opinion than in real court in both cases though.