3 ms·
> This Jeff Geerling which I have never heard of This guy doesn't have 1/10000 of the relevance Metallica had at the time It's weird that you seem to think a
by PhasmaFelis 2y ago
> This Jeff Geerling which I have never heard of
This guy doesn't have 1/10000 of the relevance Metallica had at the time
It's weird that you seem to think a person's level of fame is relevant to a discussion of their legal rights.
- kube-system 2y agoIn terms of personality rights, it is relevant. Although I would think Jeff is enough of a public figure to make a case here
- meiraleal 2y agoWhat legal rights? TIL voice imitators are criminals. /s
- consteval 2y ago> TIL voice imitators are criminals. /s First off, this reddit speak needs to go in a fire and die. Seriously, stop typing like this, nobody likes it. Secondly, yes voice imitators CAN be criminals. If they attempt to or allude to being the real deal. You can't get on a phone interview with the news and say you're Barack Obama, even if your impression is really good. Yes, that's illegal and has been since before AI of this form existed.
- meiraleal 2y ago> Secondly, yes voice imitators CAN be criminals. Which is not the case in discussion, there is no impersonation. > First off, this reddit speak needs to go in a fire and die. Are you ok? I think you should calm down before posting.
- consteval 2y agoI'm fine thanks, and I would argue that yes there is impersonation. You can argue why it's not impersonation, but you can't say "nope uh uh no impersonation". That's not how arguments work, you can't begin in a position where you're already right.