4 ms·
It's saying that it could be either +/-50 ppm from the actual reading, or +/-5% from the actual reading, whichever is worse.
by zootboy 2y ago
It's saying that it could be either +/-50 ppm from the actual reading, or +/-5% from the actual reading, whichever is worse.
- metaphor 2y ago> It's saying that it could be either +/-50 ppm from the actual reading, or +/-5% from the actual reading, whichever is worse. No, it's stacked, and strictly applicable between 400-3000 ppm as characterized (despite 0-32000 ppm operating range by design). At the lower 400 ppm end, accuracy is +/- 50 ppm +/- 20 ppm = +/- 70 ppm. At the upper 3000 ppm end, accuracy is +/- 50 ppm +/- 150 ppm = +/- 170 ppm. Also worth noting that the calibrated reference used to determine this published accuracy has an uncertainty of +/- 2%; ref datahseet[1] Table 7. Caveat emptor: this published accuracy can't be trusted at face value when sampling more than 1 meas/min; ref ibid.[1] Table 4. [1] https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-PASCO2V15-DataSheet-v01_30-EN.pdf?fileId=8ac78c8c914a3ac8019179fecd0c351d https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-PASCO2V15-DataSheet-v...