3 ms·
> even if I'm not certain that's what the article intended. I have the impression that was exactly the intention of the article: > In the coming years, we’l
by meiraleal 2y ago
> even if I'm not certain that's what the article intended.
I have the impression that was exactly the intention of the article:
> In the coming years, we’ll see more and more people making software like someone building a table in their backyard or garage, they’ll enjoy the process and add their own personal touch.
> If you love coding the way we do it now, keep at it! enjoy every moment, improve yourself, learn new things, keep coding!
- mustache_kimono 2y ago> > I don't think writing in x86_64 is any more artisanal than Python or JavaScript. > I have the impression that was exactly the intention of the article: Okay, but you seem to be ignoring the first half of the article. You know the part that tells us it is a great big joke: "Real Programmers wrote in machine code. Not FORTRAN. Not RATFOR. Not, even, assembly language. Machine Code. Raw, unadorned, inscrutable hexadecimal numbers. Directly."
- meiraleal 2y agoTrue, I think I really skipped that quote. I disagree with this part and think it doesn't link very well with the conclusion or with software artisans. Not sure if I mixed it up or the author :)